The Transformation of Jack in William Goldings Lord of the Flies Essay

The Transformation of jak in William Goldings Lord of the Flies In the novel, Lord of the Flies, Jack is the character that get words the close to change. Jack begins the novel as a somewhat peremptory choirboy, who cries when he is not elected attracter of the island. Jack is gradually transformed into a vicious cause of death who has no respect for human life. Through a series of stages, such as leading the choir, leading the prevailing tribe, wear the mask, killing Simon, separating from the congregation and intentionally killing Piggy, Jack degenerates from a normal, arrogant school boy into a savage beast. At the beginning of the novel, Golding describes Jacks natural appearance as inside the floating cloak he was tall, ignore and bony his hair was red beneath the black cap. His face was crumpled and freckled and ugly without silliness (20). Jacks original intentions were to keep an organized group on the island. Jack agrees with Ralph when he brings the group toge ther, saying, I agree with Ralph. Weve got to keep rules and obey them. After all, were not savages. Were English, and the English are the best at everything. So weve got to do the right things (42). Although originally portrayed as a pretty normal boy, evidence of his hostility begins to emerge. While Piggy is talking, Jack exclaims, youre talking to much. Shut up fatty (21). Jack is made the leader of the hunting tribe. He and his hunters cook much trouble trying to hunt and kill a pig. Since he was raised as part of a sophisticated and wealthy family in England, he has not had any experience with hunting before. He struggles to become a hunter. But Jack is shown to have savage urges early. The author says, he Jack tried to convey the... ...a vicious killer who has no respect for human life. Works Cited Magill, Frank N., ed. Masterplots. Vol. 2. Englewood Cliffs n.p., 1949. 3 vols. Matuz, Roger., ed. contemporary Literary Criticism. Vol. 58. Detroit Gale, 1990. 68 vols. M ichel-Michot, Paulette. The Myth of Innocence,. Matuz 175-7. Comments You have a solid intervention of Jacks transformation as well a good grasp of your wrangle and grammar. Your introduction and your conclusion should be more detailed. In the introduction you should kick off the novel, itself, and introduce your topic. Why is a developing character important to the outgrowth of the novel? Your conclusion should discuss how the change in Jacks character has abnormal the rest of the group, how it has affected the plot, and perhaps, why Jacks character degenerated instead of improving.