Killing Is Never Justifies :: essays research papers

Killing Is Never Justified hood punishment, by definition, is the sub judice killing of an individual. Now, how someone could be killed legally when murder is universally recognized as a violent and serious crime. It is irrevocable, meaning that once an inhabitant of last row pays the ultimate price. The expiration penalty is corporal punishment in its most severe shape and is considered to be the ultimate form of retribution for those who have committed societys most heinous crimes, including rape and murder. Ultimately, Capital punishment is wrong due to the likelihood of error, the unjust racial allocation, and the invasion of constitutional rights. However, some(prenominal) people believe that capital punishment is morally correct and preserves human dignity.Primarily, until human judgment is set upd to be infallible, capital punishment provide always carry a likelihood of error along with it. As Hugo Adam Bedau said in his writings, Since 1900, in this country, at t hat place have been on the average of four cases per year in which an entirely innocent person was convicted of murder. Scores of these people have been sentenced to finish (Bedau 8). Considering that four completely innocent citizens had been sentenced to death, in a period of 20 years about eighty innocent people would have been falsely sentenced to death. Human judgment and the justice system in which the United States of the States is based on will never be perfect there will always be a margin of error. Because of the infallibility of human nature, a few people each year are accused of crimes in which they did non even commit. Should innocent citizens be placed on death row and sentenced to death for crimes they did not commit? Because the justice system will never be perfect and mistakes are inevitably going to be made, capital punishment is not a just solution, especially for the innocent. Furthermore, many innocent convicts have been executed, while others have been luck y enough to prove their innocence in time. Subsequently, according to the Atlanta Weekly newspaper, In atomic number 31 in 1975, Earl Charles was convicted of murder and sentenced to death. A surviving victim of the crime mistakenly identified Charles as the gunman her testimony was supported by a jail-house informant who claimed he heard Charles confess. Incontrovertible alibi evidence, showing that Charles was in Florida at the very time of the crime, eventually establishes his innocencebut not until he had spent more than three years under his death sentence.